Comment on A Motion is not a Law by Laurel L. Russwurm

Wow! Beginning a comment with an Ad Hominem! What an excellent way to establish you don’t have an argument.

I first learned about Islam (and its relationship to Christianity and Judaism) decades ago in a high school World Religions class. Here’s Wikipedia to explain it for you (with footnotes so you can go examine sources if you want to. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam

Just so you know, Canada is a country that has anti-blasphemy law on the books: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-296.html

Finally, you’ve characterized M 103 as being “Shariah-friendly” without any foundation at all.

You can believe anything you want to believe, but the fact that you believe it does not make it a fact. Your opinion is your opinion.

“Because I said so” is no more a valid argument than name calling. Should you choose to make a rebuttal, and manage to avoid any more logical fallacies or unfounded mischaracterizations, I would publish it, but I will not publish another comment as devoid of substance as this.