Why I’m NOT #Proud of #Canada150

Electoral Reform?

For someone generally proud to be lucky enough to be Canadian, instead of being excited about Canada Day on our nation’s 150th Anniversary, I was embarrassed to be a Canadian. Not because Prime Minister Justin Trudeau believes himself to be an all powerful autocrat with the right to over rule his own party’s overwhelmingly adopted policy and thumb his nose at the majority of Canadians who believe Canada ought to provide citizens with fair representation.   That was bad, that was really, really bad, but that isn’t it.

Money?

We had a big coast to coast half a billion dollar party CBC reports that More than 70% of Canada 150 swag made outside the country

Oh, but that’s not the government’s fault:

The government argues that international trade agreements don’t allow it to restrict the competition for government contracts to Canadian companies or manufacturers — even when it comes to Canada 150 merchandise.

Its all the fault of those pesky “free trade” agreements, not the governments who negotiated these agreements in secret then sign & ratify them so they have no choice but to require massive changes to our domestic law (and now unaccountable international corporate trade tribunals to fine us if we fail) to comply.  This excuse is a classic case of adding insult to injury.

Annoying as that is, that is not my problem.

Colonialism150?

Bingo!  The problem is colonization, something that didn’t just happen hundreds of years ago, but a process continuing as Canadian government policy to this day.  It is simply unfathomable to me that, KNOWING about all the horrors of “residential schools,” instead of embarking on a path to Reconciliation, our Canadian Government is continuing policies of Cultural Genocide. Residential Schools killed many more victims — all children — than people died in the 9/11 Twin Towers.  In response to the Twin Towers Canadian Governments were quick to change our laws to increasingly erode the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.   But Canadian Governments had to be legally compelled to establish the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.  And now, instead of working hard to implement TRC recommendations, the Canadian Government has gone to court to fight for the right to continue to discriminate against Indigenous children and Indigenous women.

I’m not Indigenous, I’m a settler whose paternal ancestors arrived here before Confederation.  Some suggest “settler” is pejorative term, but it’s not.  It’s a simple statement of fact. Although my earliest ancestors came to this place before Confederation, I am not Indigenous.  My ancestors came from Alsace, Germany, the Netherlands and Russia, places I have never been.  Indigenous people’s ancestors came from Turtle Island.  While I make my home on native land, I acknowledge that Turtle Island indigenous peoples have prior claim.  Although I was very interested in history, I spent most of my life ignorant of the real Canadian history.

I am certainly not trying to speak for the Indigenous people’s of Canada; they are doing a brilliant job of speaking for themselves.  As Romeo Saganash did in the Globe and Mail: 150 years of cultural genocide: Today, like all days, is an insult

No, I’m writing this for other settlers. To explain why I sat out Canada Day for the first time. To explain why I bought my husband a Colonization150 Tshirt.  But most of all why I’ve spent the last little while reading and sharing articles about the real Canada that so many Canadian settlers still don’t know about.  Some over and over.

I am still learning myself, because, like most people, I bought into the idea of the mythological Canada the Good.  The Canada full of nice, polite people who respect human rights and care about each other. The Canada that helped fight and stop South African Apartheid.  The Canada that chose to be a Multicultural mosaic culture, the nation that made peace and not war and helped write the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, our own Canadian Bill of Rights and then the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Canada willing to dabble in socialism to ensure everyone has healthcare and the necessities of life, the representative democracy that looks out for our most vulnerable population.

But that, my friends, is the public relations version, not the real deal. The real deal is a country that sells arms to Saudi Arabia, one of the most egregious human rights abusers in the world. The Canada that unequivocably supports Israel’s unambiguous Palestinian Apartheid.   Of course it does: Canadian Governments have been perpetrating its own policies of Apartheid and Cultural Genocide for well over 150 years, and are still doing it today.

One of the ridiculous things I often hear Canadian settlers say is that the land issue was over a long time ago.  But we Canadians believe in property ownership. Our society is built on property law.  Canadians buy and sell property, we can own it and our heirs can inherit it from us when we die.

If I can inherit my father’s house, a house that he inherited from his father, who inherited it from his father before him, why should it be any different for Indigenous people?

Their ancestors made treaties — contracts — with the British Crown.  But instead of living up to these agreements, the British then later Canadian Governments have been trying to erase them one way or another ever since.  The Canadian Government took the land one way or another, and gave or sold it to settlers.   That’s the land we buy and sell and inherit today.  The authority for this high handedness dates back to a papal decree known as “The Doctrine of Discovery.” which was predicated on the idea that any land not populated by European Christians was empty.  After all, only European Christians were human beings with rights.

It’s 2017

Instead of living up to our obligations to the Indigenous population of Turtle Island, Canadian Governments have worked hard to enforce assimilation, to suppress Indigenous culture, eradicate Indigenous languages, and coralled them on a tiny unsustainable percentage of the land… a miniscule part of the land of Turtle Island, the whole of which they once roamed freely.  The full might of Canada’s government continues its anti-Indigenous policies, all of which are geared to dispossessing them further.

Money:  It would cost the Canadian Government a fraction of the money it is spending on Canada’s 150th Party to comply with the Human Rights Tribunal’s order to stop discrimination against Indigenous children.  What is more important than children?

Electoral Reform to Proportional Representation is necessary.  It took me a long time to understand why our supposedly “simple” electoral system never actually provided me with representation in Parliament.  The Representative Democracy we Canadians supposedly enjoy is hollow so long as some votes are worth more than others but most don’t count at all. If we used some form of Proportional Representation, the result would be more democratic governance.  This would empower us to elect politicians who would actually represent most of us.  And maybe even govern the way they promised they would.

Further Reading:
Three years later, is Canada keeping its Truth and Reconciliation Commission promises?
Why is Trudeau Government Opposing Charter Equality for Indigenous Women?
Cultural Genocide of Canada’s Aboriginal People
Chief Justice says Canada attempted ‘cultural genocide’ on aboriginals
Canada was ready to abandon 1948 accord if UN didn’t remove ‘cultural genocide’ ban, records reveal
Residential school system was ‘cultural genocide,’ most Canadians believe according to poll
The Canada most people don’t see
Canada 150 is a celebration of Indigenous genocide
150 years of cultural genocide: Today, like all days, is an insult
The long history of discrimination against First Nations children
Rights and Reconciliation: The future of Canada rests on adopting the balanced world view of Indigenous people.
12 Easy Steps For Canadians To Follow If They’re Serious About Reconciliation 
Dear Canada, It’s Not Me, It’s You It’s complicated.  
ACCOUNTING FOR HISTORIES: 150 YEARS OF CANADIAN MAPLE WASHING

IdleNoMore: Turn The Tables


Electoral Reform Committees of the House: Harold AlbrechtMay 30,…



Electoral Reform Committees of the House: Harold Albrecht
May 30, 2017  

 
Madam Speaker, I, along with all my colleagues in this House, remember very clearly the number of all-candidates debates we were at through the last campaign where we heard time after time, dozens of times, probably, the Liberal candidates promising that this was going to be the last first past the post election in Canada.

Many times throughout my colleague’s speech he commented on the democratic process. If the democratic process is so important, why would the Liberal government not allow the referendum, which was clearly recommended by the democratically appointed committee, to give all Canadians a say on the voting system they would like?

It is not fair that the Prime Minister would take upon himself that one decision for the entire country.  Why not allow the Canadian population to have its say on this important issue?

— Harold Albrecht, MP (Conservative)
    Kitchener—Conestoga

Electoral Reform Committees of the House: Routine Proceedings 
https://openparliament.ca/debates/2017/5/30/gabriel-ste-marie-2/

Only 2 Liberal MPs were heroes today.  #ERRELiberal MP Sean…



Only 2 Liberal MPs were heroes today.  #ERRE

Liberal MP Sean Casey was one of only 2 Liberal MPs who voted to support Mr. Cullen’s Motion to concur in the Second Report of the Special Committee on Electoral Reform.  

Had that motion passed, it would have meant the federal Electoral Reform process that had been promised by the Liberals while campaigning in 2015, then reiterated multiple times by PM Trudeau and the Trudeau Government, and which they spent millions on before the PM unilaterally decided to pull the plug, then Parliament would have accepted the ERRE Committee report, and the process would have continued.

Sean Casey is the MP for the riding of Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, where they had a referendum in which voters chose to adopt the Mixed Member Proportional electoral system, and which that Provincial Government chose to ignore. 

Here’s the relevant bit of MP Sean Casey’s official statement:

Today in the House of Commons, I cast my vote in favour of a motion on concurrence with the report of the Special Committee on Electoral Reform.

PEI has a special connection to electoral reform. In November 2016, Islanders voted to support the implementation of a form of proportional representation in our voting system. 

In Charlottetown, about two-thirds of the ballots cast, in the end, supported a proportional system.This process ran concurrently with our government’s consultation process on changing our federal voting system as well. Understandably, many people were frustrated and disappointed with the announcement that the government would not be pursuing electoral reform, given a lack of consensus around a new electoral system.

Those who have been following the work of the Special Committee on Electoral Reform will know the amount of effort that went into producing a majority report recommending a referendum – which would include a proportional option. I cast my vote in favour of the report in order to represent the two-thirds of Charlottetown voters who supported a provincial proportional option, and in recognition of the important work conducted by the members of the Committee.

Despite my vote and the votes of other members, the motion did not pass. An important part of our system is respecting the will of the House of Commons, whose members represent all Canadians across the country. I hope my constituents know that I will continue to stand for them when it matters

Electoral Reform is NOT a new idea in Canada.CANADA ALTERS HER…



Electoral Reform is NOT a new idea in Canada.

CANADA ALTERS HER VOTING SYSTEM


Change Deemed Necessary with Three Parties Contesting


Parliament Passes “Alternative” Balloting Motion – Rejects “P.R.”


“Ottawa, Mar 9 — Canada’s Parliament has just taken an interesting step in the direction of Electoral Reform.  With the advent of a third party, the Progressives, as a vital factor in politics, it soon became clear that the old system of voting under the changed conditions could no longer guarantee satisfactory results.”

In 1909 the British Parliament at Westminster was considering…



In 1909 the British Parliament at Westminster was considering adopting the Single Transferable Vote Proportional Representation electoral system.  At the time Earl Grey, the Governor General of Canada told the press if it came to a vote, he’d be tempted to give up the cushy Canadian posting because:

“The present system,” said Earl Grey, “is government of the people by caucus for the party.”

Campaigning in 2015, Raj Saini made a convincing case for…



Campaigning in 2015, Raj Saini made a convincing case for Electoral Reform.

The citizens of Kitchener Centre elected Raj Saini to do as he promised.  

Now that his government is having cold feet, #KitCen needs their elected representative to represent them on May 31st.  

Call Raj to let him know you want him to vote for Proportional Representation.