Propaganda. Media. Israel. Genocide. Weaponized starvation.

Propaganda. Media. Israel. Genocide. Weaponized starvation.

Malnutrition in Gaza: Today questions Israeli Government
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0ls8s6l

The Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer speaks to Today’s presenter Nick Robinson following reports of malnutrition in Gaza.

Mr Mencer is asked by Nick Robinson whether he accepts there is malnutrition in Gaza, and whether the US-backed aid distribution system set up by Israel is failing.

Listen to Today on BBC Radio 4 and BBC Sounds: 6-9am on weekdays and 7-9am on Saturdays.

Release date: 25 July 2025
"Duration: 14 minute
s

The above image and text remains online, except when you try too click the link, it takes you to a BBC page that says:

"Sorry, the page you are looking for cannot be found!”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m002g52f?partner=uk.co.bbc

The problem is BBC has apparently taken it down.

Internet Archive can’t display it, because the Wayback Machine has not archived that URL since “This page is available on the web!”

BUT ALL IS NOT LOST.
The Times of Israel’s blogger Stephen Games blogged about it under the title “Want to wreck Israel’s case? Send in a spokesman
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/want-to-wreck-israels-case-send-in-a-spokesman/

Mr Games has very helpfully transcribed the hard to find interview as follows:

“I have written about this topic more than once before. On this occasion, I think it best to provide my own transcript of the conversation, which can be found here https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m002g52f and starts at 2 hours 10 minutes in.

THE INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT

Nick Robinson: There are few images more distressing to look at than those of starving children, day after day. That is what we are seeing coming out of Gaza. At another time, in another place, they would trigger international appeals for aid—a mass mobilisation to distribute it. 

But what makes this tragedy so much much worse is the fact that all sides agree there is no shortage of food waiting to supply Gaza. What there is, like so much else since Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, is a bitter and angry row about who and what is to blame. 

In May Israel dismantled the system for distributing aid in Gaza run by the UN in conjunction with international aid agencies, arguing that the food and medicines were being highjacked by Hamas and sold at vast profits. They set up in its place a new system to distribute aid along with the United States. The UN and a hundred international aid agencies say the system is failing and the proof of that is in the images we are now seeing.

Hamas, remember, still holds twenty Israeli hostages and the bodies of many others. Thousands of Israeli protesters gathered in Tel Aviv last night to call for an end to the war in Gaza. Following the main demonstration protesters blocked several streets across the city before they were dispersed by police.

That is the background conversation we now want to have with a spokesperson for the Israeli government, David Mencer, who joins us on the programme once again. Good morning to you, Mr Mencer.

David Mencer: Good morning Nick, good to be with you.

NR: I hope to take you stage by stage through this argument, because it is an argument that produces passion, it produces emotion, it produces anger and I hope you agree that it’s going to be valuable for everybody if we can take it a step at a time, to try and understand your case, to try and put to you the arguments that people put to Israel. Can we begin with a simple fact? Do you agree, do you accept, does Israel accept, there is malnutrition in Gaza, it is getting worse and at its extreme some people are starving?

DM: [long pause] Good to be with you, Nick. Yes of course; the facts are very important and I do appreciate the sentiment you were saying about having a civilised conversation, talking specifically about the facts. So the facts are important, not the fiction. In Gaza today, today there are shortages but they are shortages which have been engineered by a terrorist organisation. It is certainly not Israel’s fault that Hamas are frustrating the distribution process of aid and I’ll give you the best example of that—

NR: If you wouldn’t mind, can you just answer the first question? I was going to come to distribution, I promise you I’ll give you the chance to do that. I wanted to start with where people are starting. Do you accept there is malnutrition in Gaza, it’s getting worse and some people are starving?

DM: I will certainly say that there is—

NR: [talking over] Why is that a difficult question? Why is that a difficult question?

DM: I’m answering it, Nick, if you’ll allow me. There’s a man-made shortage but it’s been engineered by Hamas, the terrorist organisation.

NR: But I didn’t ask you whether there was a shortage, Mr Mencer, I asked you whether there was malnutrition, whether it was getting worse and whether some people are starving.

DM: Yes, there is malnutrition—and I’ll answer your question very, very clearly—but there is malnutrition engineered by the terrorist organisation. The images you show of hungry people—you don’t extend the sentence and say the words that matter: Hamas stole their food and Hamas have caused their suffering. From Israel’s point of view there is literally no restriction to the amount of aid we want to send in. There is literally no restriction. Indeed, right now, there are a thousand trucks of aid waiting on the Gazan side of the Gaza–Israel border for that aid to go in, to get to hungry people. Now—

NR: Now let’s take this a stage at a time, Mr Mencer, because you’ve just made an important point. Clearly you accuse Hamas of hijacking the aid. The problem with that argument is this, isn’t it? You’ve changed the distribution of aid, you’ve cancelled the original system of aid, you’ve set up your own system of aid, in order to stop Hamas doing what you say they’re doing. So it seems to me that you are accepting that the system that you have created is currently failing.

DM: [pause] Look, Hamas have turned this charity, aid which should go to the ordinary Gazans, they’ve turned it into a billion-dollar racket. They steal the aid—

NR: Is your system failing, Mr Manser? 

DM: No, our system—we developed a new system precisely to cut Hamas out of the picture. That’s the key point.

NR: Well, it’s the key point but is it working or isn’t it working?

DM: It is working, it is working, simply on the facts, that 90 million meals have gone in with the new system, but Hamas—you know what they’re doing— 

NR: That doesn’t prove it’s working, Mr Mencer. You’ve just acknowledged at the beginning of this conversation, there is malnutrition, it’s getting worse and there’s starvation. So just putting a large number on the amount of food distributed doesn’t prove the system is working. The evidence is whether people are getting fed or not: some are and many are not and malnutrition is getting worse and the system is not working, surely.

DM: Look, there are two parts to the aid distribution process. There is the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation where millions of meals are delivered directly to civilians, but there are also UN-coordinated shipments of food, medicine, raw materials, and flour for bakeries. Now it’s a two-pronged approach—

NR: Sure—

DM: —We haven’t shut one down in favour of the other. But we have opened an alternative—

NR: [talking across, and DM continuing to talk underneath] But you restrict access to the United Nations, don’t you? 

DM: [breaking through] But that’s not true—

NR: In order for those trucks that you—let me just put the question to you and then you can respond—

DM: But that is false, Nick. You must not say lies. You must not say falsehoods.

NR: [sneering] Don’t accuse me of lying, Mr Manser. It’s cheap and it’s unhelpful. I’ll put some facts to you. If you think they’re only a partial version, I’ll give you a chance to answer them. But at a time when people are dying of malnutrition, and hostages are languishing in tunnels, it really does not help for you to shout abuse over a line. I am not lying. I am putting a question to you. Here is the question. [DM tries to break in.] You’ll get the chance to answer the question.

DM: You ARE lying. You ARE lying. [continues]

NR: Well, listen to the question—

DM: I will answer the question now, Nick. You’ve had your chance. You invited me, indeed your producers begged me to come on and I will now give you the fact. That’s my job, as the Spokesman for the Office of the Prime Minister—to give you the facts. There are one thousand trucks of aid waiting on the Gazan side. The UN unfortunately, the US ambassador said this morning, are working in cooperation with Hamas, the terrorist organisation—that’s right: you know, you guys never report this stuff but the UN is working in cooperation with Hamas to restrict the amount of aid to their own people. They’re causing these shortages—

NR: Can I be clear about this? You’re saying that the UN is deliberately stopping the supply of food? They say—let me put this to you, this is what I wanted to put to you, to give you the chance to respond: the United Nations say that they are limited in their ability to deliver food by what the UN described to us this morning as tremendous bureaucratic impediments, tremendous security impediments, that means although they agree with you that there are trucks that could deliver aid, those trucks could not do so. To give you one example, yesterday out of sixteen attempts to coordinate humanitarian movements, only eight with facilitated by the Israeli authorities.

DM: [pause] Let me give you a better example.

NR: No, don’t give me a better example, please address that example and [DM talking underneath] and—

DM: If you could stop interrupting me, then we could get something from this interview rather than your—

NR: [talking over] Well, I think we’re getting quite a lot from the interview.

DM: You do not perceive Hamas to be a terrorist organisation, which leads to all of us in Israel with—

NR: You have no idea what I perceive, you’ve no idea what I perceive, Mr Manser.

DM: Well then, Nick, tell us all. Do you believe Hamas is a terrorist organisation?

NR: No, you’re not interviewing me; I’m interviewing you—

DM: Do you believe that Hamas is a terrorist organisation, yes or no?

NR: [DM continuing to talk under] I am interviewing you about aid, Mr Manser—

DM: They are a jihadi death cult. Do you believe? Do you believe there are a terrorist organisation? Stake yourself off from the mistaken ideas which those executives upstairs have ordered you to say, and tell me now, right now, that you believe Hamas to be a terrorist organisation.

NR: Mr Manser, every interview you do this, you try … it’s very tedious for listeners. It’s very tedious for me. 

DM: Israelis are exasperated that—

NR: [DM talking under] Shall we focus on the questions of the day? Do you accept that—

DM: —Israelis are exasperated that you do not believe that this jihadi death cult is a terrorist organisation.

NR: Good. [DM talking under] You’ve made that point three times so let’s move onto another question.

DM: Let me give you some of the facts. 

NR: No. 

DM: There are a thousand trucks waiting—

NR: You’ve said that three times! I’m asking you a question. 

DM: [persisting] Yesterday, when forty journalists went to see those thousand trucks waiting, in the sunshine, languishing in the sunshine, waiting to be distributed, lo and behold, suddenly the UN pull their finger out and start distributing aid.

NR: Okay.

DM: Israel has offered them security to deliver the aid [continues to talk].

NR: Okay, Mr Manser. You’ve made that point. Can I ask you another question? 

DM: Israel has offered them security to deliver the aid but it is unfortunately the UN which is working in cooperation which is seeking to continue this billion-dollar racket.

NR: Okay, who—

DM: The purpose of our war—

NR: Mr Manser, please stop talking so I can ask a question, please.

DM: No, the purpose of our war in Gaza is to end Hamas’s control of— 

NR: Yes. 

DM: —of, of, of the strip of land, to free Gazans from Hamas.

NR: Right.

DM: That is the purpose.

NR: Okay—

DM: We cannot leave Hamas in power. 

NR: No.

DM: There is no scenario—

NR: David Manser, I am going to ask: Mencer—I do apologise for getting your name wrong. Just allow me to ask a question, it’s just a courtesy to do that. I think you’ll agree that we have—

DM: Go ahead.

NR: —a chance. Thank you very much indeed. Okay, so you made clear you think the UN is not cooperating, they think you’re not cooperating with them. 

DM: It’s not [interrupting]—

NR: No, no, I’m going to ask a question, Mr. Mencer. 

DM: It’s a terrorist organisation.

NR: I am going to ask a question.

DM: It’s not about not cooperating. It’s working in cahoots with a terrorist organisation. 

NR: Whose responsibility is it under international law to ensure that people in the Gaza Strip are fed? 

DM: [long pause] We have a duty as human beings, as a Jewish state, to ensure there’s no starvation in Gaza. 

NR: Whose responsibility is it in international law?

DM: We don’t need to be responsive to international law. It is our duty as a country, as a Jewish state, the only Jewish state in the world, to make sure there is no starvation in Gaza, which is why we’re making it clear that there is no restriction on the amount of aid which can go in.

NR: No, but it is your responsibility to make sure that aid is distributed and currently you are failing to do that.

DM: And we have made that offer. We have made precisely that offer. Let me tell you the facts, Nick.

NR: Under the Geneva Convention Article 55 [DM continues to talk under]—trying isn’t the point. It is doing that is the point.

DM: —Hamas. Did I tell you that clearly? The Israeli army has offered the United Nations all the security it needs to deliver the aid but the United Nations say, “No, no, no, we want to be protected by the terrorist organisation.” So—and I must tell you that there is not an option where Hamas remain in power and thinking to prop up this regime of jihadi—this jihadi death cult—is simply not an option—

NR: [DM continues to talk under] So let me just bring our conversation to a conclusion, if I could. So are you saying to the audience listening to this, are you saying to those viewing images of starving people, that nothing will change? That Israel has set up a new system, you blame others for the failure of that new system, you blame Hamas, you blame the UN, you blame the international organisations, you blame the BBC and other global broadcasters for reporting it. This is all someone else’s fault and as I understand what you’re saying, there’s no intention for Israel to change anything. 

DM: [long pause] No one wants to see Gazans suffering, certainly not people in this country. It is an outrage that anyone, that any ordinary Gazan, should suffer. What’s been happening right now is that while we’ve been facilitating every single day, Hamas is the problem. They loot truck, they block distribution, they weaponise hunger and they deliberately endanger their own people, and right now there are a thousand truck which Israel wants to provide security which could provide at least twelve or two weeks’ worth of food for every single person in Gaza but the UN are telling us, “No, no, no, no, we don’t want Israeli security”—

NR: Yes.

DM: —“we want Hamas to”—

NR: I’d hoped to take you through some more arguments, Mr Manser, but forgive me, you’re often repeating points you’ve made, so if you’ll forgive me, we’ve probably got as far as we’re going to get to.

DM: Well, if you ask me a decent question, I’ll give you some new information.

NR: Well, if you’d like to apply for a job at the BBC, do give it a try, but for the moment, thank you for joining us to tell us what the Israeli government is currently thinking. David Mencer, joining us there.

CREDITS:
BBC Channel 4
[https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0ls8s6l]
David Games Blog, The Times of Israel
Want to wreck Israel’s case? Send in a spokesman
[https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/want-to-wreck-israels-case-send-in-a-spokesman]

Image Source/Credits:
BBC Radio 4 David Mencer photo (1)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0ls8s6l

DAILY EXPRESS cover Wednesday July 23, 2025:
The suffering of little Muhammad clinging on to life in Gaza hell shames us all
[https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/2085539/gaza-palestine-muhammad-israel-hamas-war]
Photo Credit: Anadolu via Getty Images

CBC: Israel bans Palestinian relief agency UNRWA from operating in the country
[https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/israel-bans-unrwa-1.7365957]
Photo Credit: Ramadan Abed/Reuters

Al Jazeera: Israelis protest to end Gaza war as anger over fate of captives boils over | Israeli police make dozens of arrests, use water cannons on protesters who gathered for the nationwide demonstration.
[https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/17/israelis-hold-nationwide-protest-to-end-gaza-war-bring-back-the-hostages]
Photo Credit: AP Photo/Mahmoud Illean

BBC Radio 4 Today video clip on Twitter/X
https://x.com/BBCr4today/status/1948665551426932762/video/1

Nick Robinson photo (1)
The Independent https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/nick-robinson-cancels-today-programme-appearance-after-concerns-over-strength-of-his-voice-a6738366.html

David Mencer photo (2) Telegram: QudsNEN
https://x.com/QudsNen/status/1786392213116649947/photo/1

David Mencer photo (3) screen cap from BBC video clip
h ttps://x.com/BBCr4today/status/1948665551426932762/video/1

Nick Robinson photo (2)
The Spectator
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/nick-robinson-hacked-in-crypto-scam/

Must Watch: Green Party of Canada Election Coverage

TONIGHT! Must Watch: Green Party of Canada Election Coverage

When I began Whoa!Canada I’d been determinedly non-partisan all my life. For various reasons I did end up joining a party — the Green Party of Canadain middle age. Even so, I’ve worked to keep partisanship out of this blog. But the Green Party Leadership race, like any major party leadership, is important for all of Canada. TVO recognized this from the get go, but even so there has been very…

View On WordPress

Must Watch: Green Party of Canada Election Coverage

When I began Whoa!Canada I’d been determinedly non-partisan all my life. For various reasons I did end up joining a party — the Green Party of Canada in middle age. Even so, I’ve worked to keep partisanship out of this blog. But the Green Party Leadership race, like any major party leadership, is important for all of Canada. TVO recognized this from the get go, but even so there has been very little serious coverage. In the Internet era, we’re no longer entirely at the mercy of MSM gatekeepers, so there’s been plenty to see online. Tonight CBC, Youtube and Facebook will present live election night coverage.


As most of the GPC Leadership campaign has coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic, although a few of the Candidates had begun cross Canada tours when the shut downs hit, there has been very little opportunity for Green Party members to actually engage with leadership candidates face to face.

But that hasn’t stopped the Canadian Greens from putting on an excellent engaging leadership campaign. Interim Leader Jo-Ann Robert’s People, Politics and Planet podcast hosted interviews with all the candidates. We began with 10 candidates, and end with 8 going into tonight’s election.

July 20-30: Regional Townhalls with the GPC Leadership Contestants.

There have been a wide variety of Interviews and Zoom meetups with Electoral District Associations across the country.

Fair Vote Canada kicked off the Green Party 2020 Leadership Debate season:

Fair Vote Canada Leadership Debate on Democracy
The Agenda with Steve Paikin: GPC Leadership Debate 2020
Canada’s place in the world: Green Party of Canada Leadership Debate

Finally, after months of hard work campaigning, CBC will be hosting the Green Party Leadership 2020 Election Night coverage!

WATCH LIVE: Green Party of Canada 2020 Leadership Election Night


Crowdsourced Proofreading

In spite of armies of editors and proof readers, main stream publishing has a long history of published typos.  And as a writer I can tell you. it’s really easy to miss something, especially in something as substantial as an article or a book.  Even if you know how to spell.

Even when a mistakes were caught, it wasn’t reasonable to assume publishers would recall books and reissue them with…

View On WordPress

Crowdsourced Proofreading

In spite of armies of editors and proof readers, main stream publishing has a long history of published typos.  And as a writer I can tell you, it’s really easy to miss something, especially in something as substantial as an article or a book.  Even if you know how to spell.

Even when a mistakes were caught, it wasn’t reasonable to assume publishers would recall books and reissue them with corrections.  Errors wouldn’t be fixed until the second edition.  If there was a second edition.

One of the most earth shattering things to happen to the world of proof readers was our move into the digital age with the invention of the spell checker.  Suddenly proof readers became obsolete.

But all spell checkers are not equal.  When the typo is a real word, no spell checker is going to flag it.  The thing we often forget about technology is that it is no more perfect than any other tool; human supervision is still required.

Wikipedia is the poster child for self publishing.  Not only does it rely on the good will of the public to add articles and factual information, if errors are made, Wikipedia is self-correcting: the public has the power to correct errors and ommissions, whether of fact or spelling.

All those mainstream publishers who no longer employ enough staff to adequately proof read their content are publishing online in digital formats.  Instead of hiring proofreaders, they often have a “report typo” option on their webspage so readers can catch their mistakes for them.  Just as CBC does.

This way, when a reader gets hit between the eyes by an annoying typo, we can report it, so others won’t have to suffer as we have.

When I found a typo in the CBC article Chippewas of the Thames vow to continue pipeline fight good neighbor that I am, I decided to let CBC know so the error could be fixed.

"You gave us hope and when it came down to the process that you pit in place for us, and we reached that pinnacle, it was not what you said."

So I clicked on the link— it should be easy, right?   But it seems CBC isn’t as interested in being told about typos as it is interested in getting personal information about anyone who wants to correct a typo.

"process that you pit in place" presumably should be "put" NOTE: Presumably you want to crowd source your proofreading. That means you seek help from people like me who are willing to take the time to notify you when CBC publishes an error. That's reasonable. What is NOT reasonable is that CBC *requires* people who are willing to HELP CBC (gratis) to turn over personal information. Name: [Required] Email address: [Required] City, Province and Country: [Required] In other words, we are not only doing work you really ought to be paying professional proof readers to do for free, and are required to pay for the privilege with our personal data. Which is why I'm not doing this again.

This isn’t a news issue, or even a matter of opinion.  If I point out the author probably didn’t mean the word “pit,”  it doesn’t matter who I am or where I live.  I could be living in Iceland and it would still be a typo.  Either I’m right or I’m wrong.

Something that ought to take a minute and cost me nothing but a bit of time I was willing to spend, ended up costing me privacy.

There is no need for it, but this has become a prevalent practice online.  Our personal information has become a valuable commodity that companies want for themselves, and very often to sell.

If you’ve ever wondered why you get spam, this is why.   (I know someone who gave up an email account because he got so much spam.)

We need to stop giving our personal details to companies who have no legitimate need of them.

If you’re buying something that needs to be delivered, sure, you have to give your address.  But if you’re making a donation to a political party and they want to be able to connect with you, they will need an address, a phone number, or an email address— but not all three.  If you’re leaving a comment or signing a petition, they want to make sure you’re a real person, not a bot.

Companies want it all; whether they need it or not.  If you give it to them, when you tell them to stop phoning you, they can send you junkmail or spam.  If CBC or any person or company tells you information they have no right to is “required” the correct answer is “none of your business.”

Privacy is an important part of personal security; don’t give up any more than you have to.


Electoral Reform in the News: CBCFollow the progression of…



Electoral Reform in the News: CBC

Follow the progression of Justin Trudeau’s promise to “Make every vote count” to BALONEY 

June 16, 2015

Justin Trudeau vows to end 1st-past-the-post voting in platform speech
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-vows-to-end-1st-past-the-post-voting-in-platform-speech-1.3114902

Oct. 20, 2015
Justin Trudeau’s Liberals to form majority government
http://www.cbc.ca/news2/interactives/results-2015/

Oct 21, 2015
Trudeau unlikely to change voting system, say political scientists
Experts say campaign trail promise for proportional representation at odds with reality of majority
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/trudeau-proportional-representation-voting-system-1.3280995

Oct 28, 2015
Liberal changes to electoral system ‘set up to fail,’ says defeated NDP MP Craig Scott:
'I honestly do not believe that there is a commitment to proportional representation,’ outgoing MP says
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/craig-scott-electoral-reform-1.3293329

Nov 01, 2015
Justin Trudeau’s electoral reform plan needs to 'get going’
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-electoral-reform-first-past-the-post-1.3292694

Nov 26, 2015
Change to preferential ballot would benefit Liberals

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-preferential-ballot-1.3332566

Dec 09, 2015
Rona Ambrose demands Liberals hold referendum on electoral reform

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/electoral-reform-liberal-referendum-1.3357673

Feb 5, 2016
NDP wants to use proportional representation to decide fate of first-past-the-post

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ndp-liberals-electoral-reform-1.3434297

May 5, 2016
Trudeau apologizes in House over misleading remarks on electoral reform delay
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-apologizes-electoral-reform-1.3568632

May 10, 2016
We can do better’: Liberals kick off push to change Canada’s voting system
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberals-electoral-reform-1.3576472

May 11, 2016
Electoral reform: a primer on the main alternatives to how we vote
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/electoral-reform-types-1.3577721

May 12, 2016
Liberal pursuit of electoral reform off to a difficult start

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-liberals-electoral-reform-1.3579651

May 15, 2016
Partisan interests difficult to avoid in electoral reform debate

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-electoral-reform-politics-1.3577086

May 31, 2016
The electoral reform fight has only just begun: Aaron Wherry

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-electoral-reform-1.3609790

Jun 12, 2016
Electoral reform: a primer on the main alternatives to how we vote
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/electoral-reform-types-1.3577721

Referendum on electoral reform would be fraught with complications
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-electoral-reform-referendum-1.3630702

Jun 21, 2016
Welcome to the summer of electoral reform: No sunscreen required for dozen lucky MPs

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-electoral-reform-committee-1.3643701

July 6, 2016
Maryam Monsef tells Commons committee first-past-the-post voting system is 'antiquated’

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-monsef-committee-1.3666961

July 7, 2016
Chief electoral officer warns of tight timeline to implement electoral reform

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-mayrand-electoral-reform-1.3668566

July 10, 2016
Maryam Monsef’s earnest guide to electoral reform for cynics

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/maryan-monsef-electoral-reform-guide-1.3670291

July 29, 2016
MPs devoting the summer to electoral reform; a look at what they’ve heard so far

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/electoral-reform-committee-roundup-1.3700856

July 31, 2016
How electoral reform is like the Stanley Cup finals

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-electoral-reform-stanley-cup-1.3700900

Oct 19, 2016
Trudeau says government’s popularity has dampened public’s desire for electoral reform

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-trudeau-electoral-reform-1.3811862

Oct 21, 2016
How does Justin Trudeau really feel about electoral reform? Let’s go to the tape
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-trudeau-electoral-reform-opinion-1.3814319

Nov 16, 2016
New Democrats say they are open to referendum on electoral reform
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-ndp-electoral-reform-referendum-1.3853832

Dec 01, 2016
Canada’s electoral reform file has reached tire fire status: Robyn Urback

http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/electoral-reform-tire-fire-1.3876961

Minister 'disappointed’ as electoral reform committee recommends referendum on proportional representation
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-electoral-reform-committee-1.3866879

Baloney Meter: Did the Liberals promise electoral reform only with broad support?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/electoral-reform-liberals-monsef-1.3876002

Dec 2, 2016
Words that I deeply regret’: Maryam Monsef apologizes for accusations against MPs

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/maryam-monsef-apology-electoral-reform-1.3878457

Dec 02, 2016
Time for Liberals to decide if they’re serious about electoral reform: Aaron Wherry

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-trudeau-electoral-reform-1.3876735

Dec 05, 2016
Liberal government launches online survey meant to spur electoral reform conversation
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-electoral-reform-survey-1.3881043


Jan 11, 2017
The Pollcast: What the cabinet shuffle means for electoral reform
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-monsef-shuffle-electoral-reform-1.3930891


Jan 12, 2017
Maryam Monsef escapes the Liberal adventure in electoral reform
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-monsef-shuffle-electoral-reform-1.3930891

Jan 19, 2017
Neil Young among artists, activists urging Trudeau government to reform electoral system

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/electoral-reform-neil-young-1.3942661

Jan 24, 2017
Liberal survey on voting reform delivers conflicting messages
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mydemocracy-survey-results-electoral-reform-1.3950671

Feb 01, 2017
Opposition accuses Trudeau of 'betrayal’ as Liberals abandon promise of electoral reform
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-electoral-reform-mandate-1.3961736

OPINION:  Say goodbye to electoral reform — a promise that was born sickly: Robyn Urback
http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/goodbye-to-electoral-reform-1.3962324

Feb 02, 2017
Voting reform groups 'disappointed’ by abandoned Liberal promise

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/fair-vote-canada-electoral-1.3963361

Feb 03, 2017
Liberal fears of proportional representation and a referendum killed Trudeau’s reform promise

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-reform-promise-referendum-1.3963533

Feb 05, 2017
Trudeau’s promise of electoral reform: From 'we can do better’ to accusations of betrayal

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-trudeau-electoral-reform-promise-betrayal-1.3962386

Feb 07, 2017
With electoral reform off the table, minister defends first-past-the-post

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/politics/gould-first-past-the-post-1.3970658