
Photo

When a 15 year old Canadian child named Omar Khadr was dug out of the rubble on July 27, 2002 he was so badly wounded he was not expected to survive.
At the age of ten he was uprooted from his life in Canada by his father and taken away to Afghanistan.
The UN Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict establishes that children younger than 18 who are involved in armed conflicts are Child Soldiers. This protocol was written in 2000, but it came into force on into force on 12 February 2002. This is an “optional” protocol, meaning there is no obligation for any nation to sign it. The Canada is a signatory to this. By signing and ratifying this, the Canadian Government voluntarily chose to place Canada under its terms, so it it is no longer “optional.”
This protocol recognizes the fact that child soldiers are children, and children are not entirely responsible for themselves. This is hardly a stretch: Canadian Law recognizes this too. We have a special set of criminal laws for children. Children are not allowed to sign legal contracts or legally able to consent for themselves; a parent or guardian is required to decide whether or not to consent on their behalf.
Omar Khadr was only 15 years old when the compound he was in in Afghanistan was attacked by the American military. Under Canadian Law he was a Child Soldier.
Omar Khadr was born Canadian. He has always been a Canadian citizen.
Canadians are guaranteed protections under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
“Canada actively participated in a process contrary to Canada’s International human rights obligations and contributed to Mr. Khadr’s ongoing detention so as to deprive him of his right to Liberty and Security of the Person guaranteed by Section 7 of the Charter, contrary to the principles of fundamental justice.”
— Supreme Court of Canada, 2010
“The core issue repeatedly identified by the Supreme Court of Canada: in the pursuit of Justice and National Security, Governments must respect Charter Rights and Human Rights, and the Rule of Law.”
—Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale
Guilt or innocence makes no difference: all citizens, guilty or innocent are supposed to be protected by the Charter.
What really happened is the subject of much hot debate.
Human Rights Watch PDF: Omar Khadr: Military Commission Trial of Ex-Child Soldier
http://www.nationalobserver.com/2017/07/07/opinion/what-if-omar-khadr-isnt-guilty
CBC made this awesome documentary in
The US vs Omar Khadr Pt. 1 | CBC
The US vs Omar Khadr Pt. 2 | CBC
The US vs Omar Khadr Pt. 3 | CBC
The US vs Omar Khadr Pt. 4 | CBC
The US vs Omar Khadr Pt. 5 | CBC
What is very clear is that the only “evidence” supporting Omar Khadr’s charge and plea bargained conviction for killing anyone, was Omar’s confession. The problem is that Omar’s confession was made under duress when his American captors tortured him.
What is wrong with people that they have trouble understanding that torture is not only wrong, but not a reliable way to get at the truth? This cannot be stressed enough: TORTURE DOES NOT WORK. CIA documents freely admit, as has been known around the world for decades, that torture does not produce reliable or useful information. When someone is being tortured, they will tell their torturers anything they imagine the torturers might want to hear in their desperation to make it stop, and this information is almost invariably unreliable at best. Torture does not provide good, reliable, or useful information. Period. So torture justifiers are not only telling us “I don’t care if we behave as morally as Nazis, and I don’t care if we tortured bad guys or completely innocent people that had done nothing wrong” but also “I don’t even care whether it works or not, whether we got good or useful information of any kind at all.” It’s in black and white right there in the recently released documents: the torture program did not produce useful or reliable or true information, it only produced misery.
The CIA report on their own torture program clearly states that torture was ineffective and did NOT produce useful intelligence. That’s been reported in a dozen places, like here:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-2865933/Report-CIA-torture-released-Tuesday-White-House.htmland again here
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/cia-torture-report/senate-report-finds-cia-interrogation-tactics-were-ineffective-n264621
The people performing torture frankly admit that it doesn’t work
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/8833108/Torture-is-not-wrong-it-just-doesnt-work-says-former-interrogator.htmland there’s more here. Torture “is a poor technique that yields unreliable results, may damage subsequent collection efforts, and can induce the source to say what he thinks the interrogator wants to hear.” Not only is torture ineffective at gathering reliable information, but it also increases the difficulty of gathering information from a source in the future.
— https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effectiveness_of_torture_for_interrogationand indeed, torture has a very long and incredibly well documented history of being virtually useless for acquiring useful information
https://www.livescience.com/4651-torture-long-history-working.htmlOmar Khadr, after being captured as a child and tortured for years, was told by his torturers that his only hope of ever ending the torture was to plead guilty. “His lawyers were told, You have two choices: You can plead guilty and you get another eight years in Guantanamo. Or you can plead innocent, in which case, you’re here forever. So those are the choices his lawyers were given, practically in those words.”
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/15917-noam-chomsky-smoke-and-mirrors-or-civil-liberties-under-president-obamaCondemning Khadr based on a confession acquired through torture is not justice. In this divisive and mean spirited age, let’s at the very least agree that we disapprove of torture. How can the bar possibly be set that low?
“Our rights are not subject to the whims of the government of the day.”
—Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould
Civil rights exist to protect citizens, they aren’t optional.
This is not a partisan issue— unless, of course, you consider the danger inherent in electing politicians who think its okay to torture citizens. Currently this is against the law in Canada. It doesn’t matter whether you are innocent or guilty, Canadian citizens have rights. Our governments are unaccountable enough now; the Supreme Court of Canada is holding it to account.
Colten Boushie, 22 yrs old, from Red Pheasant First Nation, was shot dead by a rural saskatchewan man when he came towards him for help for a flat tire. The shooter is pleading not guilty to 2nd degree murder. Why was he granted bail?
Colten’s family is asking for justice
This young indigenous man that had his whole life in front of him. He was training to be a fireman and was involved in his community church.
Racism kills.
The night Colten Boushie died:
What family and police files say about his last day, and what came after
For someone generally proud to be lucky enough to be Canadian, instead of being excited about Canada Day on our nation’s 150th Anniversary, I was embarrassed to be a Canadian. Not because Prime Minister Justin Trudeau believes himself to be an all powerful autocrat with the right to over rule his own party’s overwhelmingly adopted policy and thumb his nose at the majority of Canadians who believe Canada ought to provide citizens with fair representation. That was bad, that was really, really bad, but that isn’t it.
We had a big coast to coast half a billion dollar party CBC reports that More than 70% of Canada 150 swag made outside the country
Oh, but that’s not the government’s fault:
The government argues that international trade agreements don’t allow it to restrict the competition for government contracts to Canadian companies or manufacturers — even when it comes to Canada 150 merchandise.
Its all the fault of those pesky “free trade” agreements, not the governments who negotiated these agreements in secret then sign & ratify them so they have no choice but to require massive changes to our domestic law (and now unaccountable international corporate trade tribunals to fine us if we fail) to comply. This excuse is a classic case of adding insult to injury.
Annoying as that is, that is not my problem.
Bingo! The problem is colonization, something that didn’t just happen hundreds of years ago, but a process continuing as Canadian government policy to this day. It is simply unfathomable to me that, KNOWING about all the horrors of “residential schools,” instead of embarking on a path to Reconciliation, our Canadian Government is continuing policies of Cultural Genocide. Residential Schools killed many more victims — all children — than people died in the 9/11 Twin Towers. In response to the Twin Towers Canadian Governments were quick to change our laws to increasingly erode the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. But Canadian Governments had to be legally compelled to establish the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. And now, instead of working hard to implement TRC recommendations, the Canadian Government has gone to court to fight for the right to continue to discriminate against Indigenous children and Indigenous women.
I’m not Indigenous, I’m a settler whose paternal ancestors arrived here before Confederation. Some suggest “settler” is pejorative term, but it’s not. It’s a simple statement of fact. Although my earliest ancestors came to this place before Confederation, I am not Indigenous. My ancestors came from Alsace, Germany, the Netherlands and Russia, places I have never been. Indigenous people’s ancestors came from Turtle Island. While I make my home on native land, I acknowledge that Turtle Island indigenous peoples have prior claim. Although I was very interested in history, I spent most of my life ignorant of the real Canadian history.
I am certainly not trying to speak for the Indigenous people’s of Canada; they are doing a brilliant job of speaking for themselves. As Romeo Saganash did in the Globe and Mail: 150 years of cultural genocide: Today, like all days, is an insult
No, I’m writing this for other settlers. To explain why I sat out Canada Day for the first time. To explain why I bought my husband a Colonization150 Tshirt. But most of all why I’ve spent the last little while reading and sharing articles about the real Canada that so many Canadian settlers still don’t know about. Some over and over.
I am still learning myself, because, like most people, I bought into the idea of the mythological Canada the Good. The Canada full of nice, polite people who respect human rights and care about each other. The Canada that helped fight and stop South African Apartheid. The Canada that chose to be a Multicultural mosaic culture, the nation that made peace and not war and helped write the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, our own Canadian Bill of Rights and then the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Canada willing to dabble in socialism to ensure everyone has healthcare and the necessities of life, the representative democracy that looks out for our most vulnerable population.
But that, my friends, is the public relations version, not the real deal. The real deal is a country that sells arms to Saudi Arabia, one of the most egregious human rights abusers in the world. The Canada that unequivocably supports Israel’s unambiguous Palestinian Apartheid. Of course it does: Canadian Governments have been perpetrating its own policies of Apartheid and Cultural Genocide for well over 150 years, and are still doing it today.
One of the ridiculous things I often hear Canadian settlers say is that the land issue was over a long time ago. But we Canadians believe in property ownership. Our society is built on property law. Canadians buy and sell property, we can own it and our heirs can inherit it from us when we die.
If I can inherit my father’s house, a house that he inherited from his father, who inherited it from his father before him, why should it be any different for Indigenous people?
Their ancestors made treaties — contracts — with the British Crown. But instead of living up to these agreements, the British then later Canadian Governments have been trying to erase them one way or another ever since. The Canadian Government took the land one way or another, and gave or sold it to settlers. That’s the land we buy and sell and inherit today. The authority for this high handedness dates back to a papal decree known as “The Doctrine of Discovery.” which was predicated on the idea that any land not populated by European Christians was empty. After all, only European Christians were human beings with rights.
Instead of living up to our obligations to the Indigenous population of Turtle Island, Canadian Governments have worked hard to enforce assimilation, to suppress Indigenous culture, eradicate Indigenous languages, and coralled them on a tiny unsustainable percentage of the land… a miniscule part of the land of Turtle Island, the whole of which they once roamed freely. The full might of Canada’s government continues its anti-Indigenous policies, all of which are geared to dispossessing them further.
Money: It would cost the Canadian Government a fraction of the money it is spending on Canada’s 150th Party to comply with the Human Rights Tribunal’s order to stop discrimination against Indigenous children. What is more important than children?
Electoral Reform to Proportional Representation is necessary. It took me a long time to understand why our supposedly “simple” electoral system never actually provided me with representation in Parliament. The Representative Democracy we Canadians supposedly enjoy is hollow so long as some votes are worth more than others but most don’t count at all. If we used some form of Proportional Representation, the result would be more democratic governance. This would empower us to elect politicians who would actually represent most of us. And maybe even govern the way they promised they would.
Further Reading:
Three years later, is Canada keeping its Truth and Reconciliation Commission promises?
Why is Trudeau Government Opposing Charter Equality for Indigenous Women?
Cultural Genocide of Canada’s Aboriginal People
Chief Justice says Canada attempted ‘cultural genocide’ on aboriginals
Canada was ready to abandon 1948 accord if UN didn’t remove ‘cultural genocide’ ban, records reveal
Residential school system was ‘cultural genocide,’ most Canadians believe according to poll
The Canada most people don’t see
Canada 150 is a celebration of Indigenous genocide
150 years of cultural genocide: Today, like all days, is an insult
The long history of discrimination against First Nations children
Rights and Reconciliation: The future of Canada rests on adopting the balanced world view of Indigenous people.
12 Easy Steps For Canadians To Follow If They’re Serious About Reconciliation
Dear Canada, It’s Not Me, It’s You It’s complicated.
ACCOUNTING FOR HISTORIES: 150 YEARS OF CANADIAN MAPLE WASHING
pink
gladiolus
Our American friends are debating whether Health Care is a human right, but Canadians decided that it was long ago. Which is why it is bizarre that, of all the countries with Universal Health Care, Canada is the only country that doesn’t have Universal Pharmacare!
In 2014, Dr. Eric Hoskins ~ Ontario’s Liberal Minister of Health and Long-Term Care ~ wrote an OpEd for the Globe and Mail explaining Why Canada needs a national pharmacare program
It has been estimated that Universal public drug coverage would:
A Mowat Centre study published by Lindsay Handren in in 2015 goes even further:
“Overall, it estimates a universal pharmacare plan would save up to $11.4 billion a year, with $1 billion of that saved just by no longer duplicating administrative costs in the current “patchwork” system.”
However, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s federal Liberal Government have more important things to worry about than the health of its citizens, so the Ontario Liberals Government has stepped up to the plate with an intention to add publicly funded pharmacare coverage for children and youth ~ adding to the patchwork system.
“Because Ontario is adding universal, comprehensive pharmacare coverage to the age group that uses medicines least often. Many working-age Ontarians, who are far more likely to require medicines than children, will still be uninsured.”
This Wednesday, June 28th, the new KW Chapter of the Council of Canadians is hosting a Pharmacare Town Hall Meeting from 7 – 9pm at First United Church in Waterloo (map). The Panel Discussion will include Dr. Sherilyn Houle (UW School of Pharmacy), Kitchener-Waterloo MPP Catherine Fife will be representing the NDP, and our own Stacey Danckert will represent the Greens. Kitchener Centre MP Raj Saini (a pharmacist before going into politics) was supposed to be there representing the Liberal Party but backed out.
With a provincial election in the offing, this should be a lively event. We hope to see you there!
Until July 13th you can sign Steve Morgan’s ePetition E-959 (HEALTH CARE SERVICES)
which calls upon the Government of Canada to:
1. Implement through a Federal law, a Pan-Canadian Universal Pharmacare Plan, in this 42nd Parliament; and2. Implement a National Formulary for medically necessary drugs including a drug monitoring agency providing regulations and oversight to protect Canadians.
For more information download the PDFs of the Pharmacare studies:
CMAJ: Estimated cost of universal public coverage of prescription drugs in Canada
Mowat Centre: Unfilled Prescriptions: the Drug Coverage Gap in Canada’s Health Care Systems
[largely reprinted from WRGreens “Pharmacare Town Hall Wednesday!“]
The Buzz: Happy Multiculturalism Day
I don’t feel much like celebrating Canada150 because
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission estimates 4,000 to 6,000 children died in residential schools.
Hey Canada!
Stop Discriminating Against Indigenous Children!
At least 3 times as many First Nations children are in state care today than in the worst residential school days.